Metal3DPrinting.ai

Independent metal AM

Metal AM standards, translated into plain English

Standards can look like alphabet soup. Start with the business question: terminology, operator qualification, production-site quality, powder or finished-part testing.

ISO/ASTM 52900:2021

Fundamentals and vocabulary

In plain English: The shared dictionary for additive manufacturing. It defines the terms people use when talking about AM processes.

Why should I care? Use it when terminology is causing confusion between customers, suppliers or internal teams.

Do I need it? You may encounter it whenever a contract, procedure or technical document needs standardized AM language.

Who should confirm? Your customer, contract owner, quality lead or responsible regulatory authority.

Official source ↗

ISO/ASTM 52920:2023

Requirements for industrial AM processes and production sites

In plain English: A quality-focused framework for how an industrial additive-manufacturing production site manages AM-relevant processes and quality activities.

Why should I care? It matters when you are moving from experimenting with AM to running a controlled production operation.

Do I need it? Potentially, if your quality system, customer or production program points to it. It adds AM-specific requirements beyond a general quality-management system.

Who should confirm? Your customer, contract owner, quality lead or responsible regulatory authority.

Official source ↗

ISO/ASTM 52942:2020

Qualifying laser metal powder-bed machine operators for aerospace

In plain English: Requirements for qualifying operators of laser metal powder-bed fusion machines when aerospace operator qualification is required.

Why should I care? It separates “someone has used the machine” from a formal operator-qualification requirement in the aerospace context.

Do I need it? The standard itself says it applies when operator qualification testing is required by contract or aerospace application standards.

Who should confirm? Your customer, contract owner, quality lead or responsible regulatory authority.

Official source ↗

ISO/ASTM 52908:2023

Post-processing, inspection and testing of metal powder-bed parts

In plain English: Requirements for qualification, quality assurance, post-processing, inspection and testing of metal parts made by powder bed fusion.

Why should I care? Printing is only one stage. This standard focuses on the work used to establish finished-part properties and defined quality levels.

Do I need it? It is intended for part providers and customers of PBF metal parts. Whether your job must use it depends on the contract, application and quality requirements.

Who should confirm? Your customer, contract owner, quality lead or responsible regulatory authority.

Official source ↗

ISO/ASTM 52907:2019

Methods to characterize metallic powders

In plain English: Standardized methods for characterizing metal powder feedstock used in additive manufacturing.

Why should I care? Powder condition can affect process control and qualification, so teams need consistent ways to describe and test it.

Do I need it? Potentially when your material-control or qualification plan requires standardized powder characterization.

Who should confirm? Your customer, contract owner, quality lead or responsible regulatory authority.

Official source ↗

A useful rule

Do not buy a standard because a website mentioned it. First identify the customer, contract, application or internal quality requirement that creates the need, then confirm the current edition with the responsible quality authority.